Oh, Oh, check out the second sentence. Now why doesn't that surprise us? If we are such a great nation then why does Europe and Canada put their citizens before corporate profit and we can't do that just once?
"Nanotechnology and Our Food
The subject of nanotechnology and our food supply offers an alarming
view of the potential for human health issues. Amazingly, the U.S.
government currently does not regulate the use of nanotechnology in food
products, despite its widespread use and serious public health
concerns. Europe and the Canadian government have taken the first steps
to limit the use of nanotechnology in food, but the U.S. has so far only
issued draft guidelines to companies.
The chemical industry has already incorporated nanomaterials into
foods like dietary supplements and “food contact substances,” including
cutting boards, plastic containers and sandwich bags used to store
leftovers or pack lunches. Industry claims their products will make food
safer, and have pushed out a wide variety of nanoscale applications in
food packaging and processing that is already on the market with many
others in development. We know very little about the health effects of
consuming engineered nanomaterials, but what we do know is that is
presents cause for alarm. Scientific research indicates that engineered
nanomaterials may pose significant health risks if inhaled, ingested or
spread on the skin. A 2012 National Research Council study notes that
“there is little progress” on research about the human health effects of
oral consumption of nanomaterials.
Center for Food Safety and Nanotechnology
Center for Food Safety believes that a precautionary approach to
nanotechnology in food is fundamental. A precautionary approach requires
mandatory, nano-specific oversight mechanisms to account for the unique
characteristics of the materials. Within those mechanisms, the
protection of public health and worker safety requires a committed focus
on critical risk research and immediate action to mitigate potential
exposures until safety is demonstrated. Similar emphasis and action must
be taken with regard to safeguarding the natural environment.
Throughout, oversight must be transparent and provide public access to
information regarding decision-making processes, safety testing and
products. Open, meaningful and full public participation at every level
is essential. These discussions and analyses should include
consideration of nanotechnology’s wide-ranging effects, including
ethical and social impacts. Finally, developers and manufacturers need
to be treated as stewards responsible for the safety and effectiveness
of their processes and products, and retain liability for any adverse
impacts stemming from them. Governmental bodies, organizations and
relevant parties should implement comprehensive oversight mechanisms
enacting, incorporating and internalizing these basic principles as soon
as possible."http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/campaign/nanotechnology/
No comments:
Post a Comment