Thursday, December 6, 2012

I apologize - "They" have been CRAZY all along

So, ladies and gentlemen, my good audience.  I have been ranting about the government, and chemical companies, and big agricultural businesses with all their herbicides, pesticides, chemicals in the plastic, poisoned water, poisoned everything and I have been doing this since October and then I am driving home from work last night and I hear on the radio, NPR that is, an interview with an author who wrote a book about WINE.  The "sacred" drink, from ancient times.
 http://www.npr.org/2012/12/04/166186416/inventing-wine-the-history-of-a-very-vintage-beverage

Here is the quote from the NPR website:  
"Wine is our original alcoholic beverage. It dates back 8,000 years and, as Paul Lukacs writes in his new book, Inventing Wine: A New History of One of the World's Most Ancient Pleasures, was originally valued more because it was believed to be of divine origin than for its taste. And that's a good thing, Lukacs tells Fresh Air's Terry Gross, because early wine was not particularly good."

You might ask why would I be apologizing and what does this guy have to do with our chemicals of today.  Well, because, PEOPLE ARE CRAZY  - have been from the beginning of time. The explanation is found in the next part of the quote:

"People would add a variety of unexpected ingredients to obscure and enhance the flavor. Everything, Lukacs says, "from lead to ash to myrrh to various kinds of incense, spices. And the most common thing added, especially to wines that people valued, were fresh resin from pine trees or boiled resin — namely pitch — from pine trees. Lead, in fact, will sweeten wine, so lead was used for thousands and thousands of years."

YEP!  Lead, Ash, Marble dust was another one that was mentioned on the radio.  I was, well, flabbergasted, then I got to considering that they probably didn't even think about any side effects, shoot, the water was apparently not very good either because this author indicated that they put wine in the water to make it drinkable. 

So, what does this have to do with all of our man-made chemicals that are put in everything we manufacture, grow and consume?  Well, nothing really.  I just wanted to point out that this kind of crazy behavior has been going on since the beginning. 

By the way, it sounded like a really good book to read.  I wasn't trying to bash the author, it was the content of the wine, really. 

Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Replacement Chemicals, Let Me Guess - More Flame Retardants

Just a little follow up here on the previous posts about flame retardants - really. Can. Not. Get. Away.

So, one of my volunteer firemen friends says to me, never seen any furniture in a burning house with flame retardants that didn't burn up too! 

As the heading on the article says,

New Flame Retardants, Other Replacement Chemicals, Pose Same Problems As Predecessors

If you put a sheep's coat on a wolf it is still a wolf.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/28/flame-retardants-couches_n_2203242.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Oh Great - Now What. There goes the Bacon!


Just in off of Twitter, now there is anti-biotic resistant bacteria being found in pork.  I know, I know, it is not a confirmed report, and yet, its probable, given everything we know.  It was a new study done by Consumer Reports.

CAN WE JUST STATE FOR THE RECORD THAT OUR FOOD IS KILLING US!  I know I need to calm down, but it's 11:45 p.m. and I should be in bed but when I see this sort of stuff, it really really really upsets me that our government - large agri-business - corporations - let's call it what it is PROFITEERS - get to make all the rules.   

There is also a growth drug given to pigs.  Oh, and that's not all -  Here is some of the report from the site:  http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2012/11/fun-antibiotic-resistant-bugs-your-pork 
 
 The following is an excerpt from the article - go and read it all - you will be appalled.     And, yes, they are to self-regulate I believe is the way it was put.
 
Consumer Reports also found traces of a veterinary drug, ractopamine, in 20 percent of its pork samples. Used to spur growth in pigs, ractopamine is fed to an estimated 60-80 percent of hogs raised in the US. Though it was present at levels deemed safe by the FDA, in many countries the jury's still out about whether ractopamine is safe at all. The European Union and China require imported meat to be ractopamine-free. And US companies like Chipotle and Whole Foods refuse to serve pork raised with the drug. When USDA meat inspectors reported an increase of adverse side effects from Paylean, the drug's brand name, the FDA requested that the drug's manufacturer Elanco add a warning label in 2002. As reporter Helena Bottemiller exposed earlier this year, the FDA received reports of adverse side effects in more than 160,000 pigs taking ractopamine, though the agency would not confirm that the bad reactions were a result of the drug.
Representative Louise Slaughter (NY) called the results of the Consumer Reports study "simply terrifying" and criticized the FDA and food industry's "half-measures and voluntary guidelines" as inadequate in protecting the public against the rise in antibiotic-resistant bacteria. A bill Slaughter re-introduced to Congress in 2011, the Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act (PAMTA), would ban using routine antibiotics on healthy animals in hopes of avoiding the proliferation of superbugs, but the bill seems to be stuck in committee for the time being.
So for now, as my colleague Tom Philpott reported back in April, the pork industry is pretty much free to regulate its own antibiotic use. So gross stories like that of antibiotic-resistant bugs carried via manure on the legs of cockroaches and flies into surrounding communities could be on the rise—meaning it's not just bacon-guzzlers who have to be worried about what's going into our pork.


Tuesday, November 27, 2012

More on - What to Do, What to Do....

So, I really have been giving this whole idea of small community based activism and bringing small communities together is some way to make the small corners of the world better and branching out from there.   I do not want to re-invent the wheel, so I am searching for already established connections to make an impact. 

One of the sites that I found led me to I AM NOT A GUINEA PIG.  This website is specifically targeting chemical toxins in our environment.  The articles and information really grabbed my attention, with key words like these, Infertility,Obesity, lower sperm counts, detergents and fragrances - possibly connected to breast cancer, and Alzheimer's. 

Before I jumped in to far I wanted to know who was behind this site.  Here is the information I found so far. 
 
Environmental Defense Fund -The "I am Not a Guinea Pig" campaign is run by the Environmental Defense Action Fund (EDAF). EDAF is the lobbying arm of Environmental Defense Fund (EDF).
  
I wanted to make sure this was not a backdoor way for manufacturing corporations of these chemicals to gain profit.  From what I can find it is legitimateFinancial management 80% of our spending is on program services;Corporate donation policy -We take no money from corporate partners.  I could not find any red flags so affiliation with this organization may be viable.


It is partnered with some impressive organizations.  Here are a few of those:

Sunday, November 25, 2012

Plastics - bad ones and not so bad ones

I found the list of plastic containers that are really bad and some that are not as bad as others based upon the numbers that are on the bottoms of the containers.  It was a helpful site that I found this list on. The site is http://www.exrx.net/Nutrition/Disrupters.html

The ones I used today were #5s.  But, I did use cling wrap (a little) and that was bad.   Keeping up with all of the technical information about bad stuff and worse stuff is time consuming.  That is why I really want to organize my group of "friends, neighbors, family" to begin brainstorming how to make a bigger impact on our community.  I am still working out the bugs in my head and need to do some more research on this course of action.  Anyway, here is the information.

Worst Plastics
  • Type 3: Polyvinyl chloride (PVC)
    • Products
      • Shampoo bottles, food packaging, shower curtains, medical tubing and bags, vinyl upholstery, floor tiles, pipes, Reynolds Wrap and cling wrap for most grocery stores
        • Can pass from packaging into food, water, or cosmetics
        • Can be breathed in from curtains or pipes
    • Contain Phthalates
      • Phthalate give plastic its resilience and flexibility
  • Type 6: Polystyrene
    • One of the most widely used plastics
    • Two forms of polystyrene: inflated and non-inflated
        • Styrofoam®, a Dow Chemical Company trademarked product
        • meat trays, egg cartons
        • plastic utensils, some takeout containers, cups, bowls, plates
        • plastic models, packaging for shipping.
    • May leak styrene, especially when heated
    • Styrene is classified as a possible human carcinogen by the EPA and by the International Agency for Research on Cancer.
    • Polystyrene is not biodegradable
  • Type 7 Polycarbonate (PC), among other plastics
    • Polycarbonates
      • Reusable water bottles, dental sealants, inner lining of food cans
      • Have been used in baby bottles and "sippy" cups for kids
    • Can contain BPA which can leach into food and water
Possibly Better Plastics
  • Type 1: Polyethylene (PET or PETE)
    • Disposable containers for most bottled water, soft drinks, and juice, mouthwash, ketchup, peanut butter, jelly, etc.
    • Avoid reusing #1 bottles and jars because the plastic is porous
      • containers absorb flavors and bacteria that can't be cleaned out
  • Type 2: High Density Polyethylene (HDPE)
    • Cloudy or opaque plastic
    • Milk, water, and juice jugs
    • Bottles for shampoo and detergent
    • Cereal-box liners
  • Type 4: Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE)
    • Cling wraps, food storage bags, garbage bags, and grocery bags
    • Squeeze bottles
    • Coatings for milk cartons and hot-beverage cups
  • Type 5: Polypropylene (PP)
    • Cloudy or opaque plastic
    • Most Rubbermaid container, cloudy plastic baby bottles, deli soup containers
    • Containers for yogurt, margarine, ketchup and syrup
  • Bio-based Polymers (Biodegradable polyester)
    • Derived from renewable resources, such as corn, potatoes, sugar cane.
    • Can be composted in a municipal composter or in a backyard compost pile
    • Healthiest and most eco-friendly choice.
Alternatives
  • Food storage
    • Parchment or waxed paper
    • Glass and ceramic food storage containers
  • On the go
    • Paper plates, bowls, and cups made from sugar cane
    • Bio-plastic utensils made from plant starch
    • Stainless steel insulated storage container for hot foods
    • Stainless steel water bottles or Ball brand canning jar with lid
Codes of Concern, Time Magazine (April 1, 2010)

DEAR MOTHER EARTH...

Dear Mother Earth, today, I did not do so well. When I woke up, got out of bed and went about my morning rituals, I ran the water too long for my shower, used all sorts of products that I have no idea what was in it, and it is now making its way into our water supply. 

Forgive me Mother Earth as I forgot to turn the water off while brushing my teeth.  We had a dinner to go to so I made deviled eggs, creamed corn, and a Cottage Cheese/Jello salad.  The eggs were bought from the store and probably came from a mass chicken farm, the ingredients for the corn were all canned or frozen, and there were at least 3 wasteful plastic containers, a bag and two cans that I threw away. 

No, I take that back, I did dig them back out to rinse them with the thought that I would start recycling as of today.  The cottage cheese was probably full of some type of environmental hormones that were not labeled on the container, and the jello is definitely not real food, nor was the Cool Whip and there were two more containers of plastic. 

I did continue to refill my water thermos that I have been using so I didn't waste any red solo cups, but well Mother Earth, I know I let you down today.  But, Mother Earth, we had the dinner at my sister's house and she recycles really well, so I know that she will separate out all the paper and plastics we used from the trash and she will do for you what I did not today. But, I used the 409 spray on my cabinets to clean them after I cooked today and forgot that there were chemicals that should not be used in it.

Dear Mother Earth you are so precious to me and my awareness of the poisons and toxins we expel at you every day is at an all time high. I know the goals I wish to reach which are making my life healthier and happier and that of my family and my community.  Now I need guidance and help to achieve these goals by silencing the enemy that is killing us. 

I love my world and want to do right by you.  Please send the reinforcements to lend a hand. Good Night Mother Earth and I will try to do better tomorrow.

Thursday, November 22, 2012

Nano What?

Oh, Oh, check out the second sentence.  Now why doesn't that surprise us?  If we are such a great nation then why does Europe and Canada put their citizens before corporate profit and we can't do that just once?

"Nanotechnology and Our Food
The subject of nanotechnology and our food supply offers an alarming view of the potential for human health issues. Amazingly, the U.S. government currently does not regulate the use of nanotechnology in food products, despite its widespread use and serious public health concerns. Europe and the Canadian government have taken the first steps to limit the use of nanotechnology in food, but the U.S. has so far only issued draft guidelines to companies.

The chemical industry has already incorporated nanomaterials into foods like dietary supplements and “food contact substances,” including cutting boards, plastic containers and sandwich bags used to store leftovers or pack lunches. Industry claims their products will make food safer, and have pushed out a wide variety of nanoscale applications in food packaging and processing that is already on the market with many others in development. We know very little about the health effects of consuming engineered nanomaterials, but what we do know is that is presents cause for alarm. Scientific research indicates that engineered nanomaterials may pose significant health risks if inhaled, ingested or spread on the skin. A 2012 National Research Council study notes that “there is little progress” on research about the human health effects of oral consumption of nanomaterials.

Center for Food Safety and Nanotechnology
Center for Food Safety believes that a precautionary approach to nanotechnology in food is fundamental. A precautionary approach requires mandatory, nano-specific oversight mechanisms to account for the unique characteristics of the materials. Within those mechanisms, the protection of public health and worker safety requires a committed focus on critical risk research and immediate action to mitigate potential exposures until safety is demonstrated. Similar emphasis and action must be taken with regard to safeguarding the natural environment. Throughout, oversight must be transparent and provide public access to information regarding decision-making processes, safety testing and products. Open, meaningful and full public participation at every level is essential. These discussions and analyses should include consideration of nanotechnology’s wide-ranging effects, including ethical and social impacts. Finally, developers and manufacturers need to be treated as stewards responsible for the safety and effectiveness of their processes and products, and retain liability for any adverse impacts stemming from them. Governmental bodies, organizations and relevant parties should implement comprehensive oversight mechanisms enacting, incorporating and internalizing these basic principles as soon as possible."http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/campaign/nanotechnology/

Hammering away at the enemy

        Sometimes I lose sight of who the enemy is.  Endocrine disrupters.  Foreign chemicals in everything that I eat, touch, wear, use, etc... get in my body and trick my body into thinking these foreign "hormones" or "chemicals" are supposed to be there and they alter the way my body functions. 

       I will not name names but I know of several young ladies and younger girls that develop and enter the puberty stage earlier and earlier in life. 

      There is a cause and there is an effect to everything.  Altered food causes effects that we may not want to consider.  Plastics that let off harmful gas and toxins into the atmosphere or the contents of the container that we are using.  Cause and effect. 

        I was born in the early 60's so I have had the unfortunate life of being exposed to lots of stuff that was used before anyone knew they were bad.  My eating habit of fast food for the first 30 years of my life was enough to place me in harm's way.  Not to mention the time I got stabbed with a pencil (yes, lead, #2 I believe), that is still to this day stuck in my arm.  I can see it.  It is a very odd spot that has been there since I was in grade school.   

       I want a better life for my child, and her child(ren) and your children.  How can we alter the habits of a world gone awry. 

       Oh, and did I mention that we now have another "thing" to watch out for.  Nanotechnology.  Yes, it sounds like it is something out of Star Gate.  But its here, and it is being developed.  I will save that for my next post. 

        Here's a tidbit for all of you that have plastic bowls that have been used so much that the plastic is beginning to peal away or looks like its been scratched and melted.  Throw them away.  They are not safe to use.   The chemical in the plastic is no longer sealed in and can do more harm than good.  Till Tomorrow.  Be Safe. 

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Silencing the enemy - some good news, not a lot but some

So, I started telling you what my idea was for small community circles, or groups or whatever you want to call them, but I wanted to give you some good news.  I was reading about the latest EPA regulations that are now placing on 25 new chemical substances, yadeyadeyada - the report is so long and full of regulation language and generic language and procedures I got bored, but, the list may be something for us to keep an eye on.  Some of the new chemicals were for treatment of paper and wood products, and there was one regarding the use on meat (to keep it fresh longer).... sounds like danger to me, sorry I digressed.  I was going to tell you good news, anyway I got cross-eyed so I went searching some more and found this nice site full of wonderful tidbits. 

Here's some of the information, but as you read you will see that the fight is not over. These were figures from 2011, so there may be some differences now. The big agri-businesses are putting on the pressure.

Key U.S. Organic Facts:
  1. $31.4 billion in organic product retail sales in 2011
  2. 30-fold increase in organic product retail sales since the passage of OFPA in 1990
  3. 11.6% of organic food market comprised of fruits and vegetables
  4. 9.5% organic food sales growth in 2011
  5. 19% compounded annual growth for organic food sales 1997 –2008
  6. 20,000 organic farms
  7. 3,700 organic farms in California – the highest number of any state
  8. 527,000 jobs created by the organic foods industry in 2010 – a 21 % higher rate than the conventional foods industry
Certified Organic

Foods bearing the certified organic label and the USDA organic seal are grown, processed and certified in accordance with the legal requirements of the Organic Foods Production Act (OFPA), the law that created USDA’s organic certification program.  Passed in 1990, OFPA requires organic farmers and food manufacturers to have their production systems and product records inspected annually by a USDA-trained independent certification organization. This rigorous certification system ensures that certified organic foods are the healthiest on the market, and that consumers can look for and trust the organic label.
Certified organic foods are the best choice for people wanting to eat healthy foods, produced without the use of synthetic toxic chemicals, sewage sludge, genetically engineered ingredients, growth hormones, irradiation, and cloned animals or their offspring.  Organic is the only food grown in a manner that is legally-mandated to safeguard human health, animal welfare, and the environment.  For people who want to use their food dollars to support agricultural practices that build soil, support biodiversity, and conserve water and energy, organic remains their unrivaled best choice as well.
The Future of Food

Despite organic agriculture’s positive growth, we have reached a critical juncture in the fight for a more sustainable food future. As the organic market has grown and become more profitable, some powerful agribusiness players are trying to weaken the organic rules by pushing to allow cheaper, and often synthetic, ingredients in processed foods. Others are pushing for higher stocking rates and limits to outdoor access for poultry and livestock, both of which would curtail their natural behavior. That is why Center for Food Safety continues to remain at the forefront of debates on the future of organic food, advocating for continuous improvements to the organic standards and food production practices.  That is also why we encourage our supporters to stay involved in the organic issue by:
CFS Organic and Beyond campaign seeks to maintain and enhance strong organic standards that live up to the quality and integrity that consumers expect from organic foods.  We strive to evolve the organic ethic by promoting agriculture that is local, small, medium and family scale, biologically diverse, humane and socially just. The ultimate goal of our Organic & Beyond campaign is to progress beyond the industrial agriculture model with a new vision and practice of organic farming that supports and sustains the natural world for future generations. http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/campaign/organic-and-beyond/

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

BEGINNING TO SILENCE THE ENEMY

            Now I am just thinking out loud, but the problem with trying to rid my life of all these chemicals and toxins, is 1.) Time.  2.) Energy. 3.) Know how.  

            I know that the world populations battle with pollution, environmental damage, toxins and chemicals and endocrine disrupters and in all probability cannot be eliminated on a large scale.  At least not in one day.  It took longer than that to destroy it.  It will take longer than a day to fix it.  

            We could scream all day and riot in the streets and have demonstrations and the majority of the population would not even know what we were talking about.  In the meantime, the big box companies, corporations and conglomerates, and Multibillion Dollar Businesses will continue to do what they want with the blessings of the government so long as masses of people don't start dying off.  Then, you get some attention.  But why do we have to wait for injury.

             I am proposing that it start in small groups.  Local communities working together.  People, helping each other, teaching each other how to do things differently.  For example, I have a friend of mine that knows what plastic bottles are okay and which ones are not.  (There's a number on the bottom) - who knew.  I know of another person that recycles really well, you know the type, organized and all.  Another one knows how to can and preserve food.  Several have their own personal gardens.  My idea is to collectively pool resources and utilize the knowledge that surrounds us.  Our next door neighbors.  The friends and relatives down the street.  The local school kids or the 4-H group could lend a hand.  All I am saying is that if we limit ourselves to only what each individual knows, well, for me that doesn't get me very far in making a difference.  But, if I start asking for "Help", giving "Help", others ask for "Help" when its needed, DOESN'T EVERYONE BENEFIT? 

            Jump in and stop me any time you want.  This may just be a far-fetched hokey idea, but, I am throwing it at the wall and seeing what sticks.  In my humble opinion, the way our world is today, well, it is not getting better by any measure quickly or by any stretch of the imagination.  

           Since no one is here to stop me tonight I will take this thought one step further for now.  All of this could go a long way in accomplishing a bigger goal by lowering our ecological footprint; by working together; pooling resources and I am not talking money, I am talking errands, bartering, sharing garden produce.  For instance, we grew more okra than we could eat or can, but someone else may have had an abundance of cucumbers.  Trading is good and keeps from the waste of good home grown food.  Where do people get the good beef and chicken and pork that is not fed growth hormones or given antibiotics.  Sharing information is just as important as anything these days.  Someone going into the city?  Pick up a few items for someone so that we conserve energy and money on gas.

Here, let me get you in the mood for helping.  Good ole' Burt and Elvis - lovely.

           

What the world needs now is love - loving our world, loving our children, starting in a place that you can see a difference being made.  Your back yard, your local communities, towns; Village.  I told you I got to  thinking and that could prove dangerous but what if,

just what if,

perhaps a better way to approach this change in lifestyle habits, is to gather together to have help from the village.  You know the saying, it takes a village to raise a child.  Well, its the same concept; just better results.

WE CANNOT WAIT - I WISH FOR ....

I am sure by now those of you who have been following along with my blog knows that I have had to do some research on the talking points that I have presented about endocrine disruptors.  It is obvious to me not only through my study and reading for this blog but from my intellect that the government cannot protect us from big business, that the rules and regulations or lack of oversight may in fact be part of the problem. We must rely on ourselves to change our daily habits with regard to consumption and try to protect ourselves from the silent enemies that I began writing about.

These chemicals that we consume and are exposed to, these environmental hormones, are man-made, are bad for us; bad for our future; bad for our children;  bad for our communities, country, and our world.

We need to, ........I wish to..............bottom line is I need to....protect my daughter.  When I look at her, I don't want her to be sick, or hurt, or reach puberty too early, robbing her of a childhood.  I want her to be healthy, to eat and drink pure food and water.  I want for her to not worry about the harmful ingredients in our food.  But this shall never come to pass.  Because, we now all have to worry about the harmful ingredients in our food, in our water, in the soil we plant our food in.

I would love to play the blame game, but there would be no relief.  There has to be a solution to the continued exposure to life-threatening STUFF!      Any suggestions? 

Monday, November 19, 2012

What to Do, what to do, what to do......

The real question to be asked is what to do about all of the toxic chemicals we have come into contact with, how do we prevent further exposure and how do we accomplish that. 




Here is an awesome site that has several wonderful tips on how to recognize and minimize the toxins in our homes.  http://eartheasy.com/live_reducing_indoor_toxins.html
These are some of their tips:

How to minimize Exposure:
• Establish a 'no-shoes' policy in your home - The simplest way to keep outdoor pesticides, especially lawn chemicals, from entering your home is to have family members and visitors leave their shoes at the door. This will also reduce the need for home cleaning. You can provide inexpensive slippers for guests if you think they'll be put off having to remove their shoes.
• Buy fresh, organic produce
- For the freshest organic vegetables, grow your own produce in a simple backyard garden. Or choose foods which are known to have fewer pesticides applied during the growing season. Free range organic eggs are available in many stores, but ask questions about the extent of the ‘range’. Ideally, you may find a local farmer who can provide true free-range eggs.
• Avoid using chemical-based pest control products in the home – there are safe alternatives for pest control available today which can effectively control most insect pests without the need for harmful chemicals. Small amounts of diatomaceous earth, for example, will kill a variety of home insects, including fleas, while posing no harm to children or pets. Pest control products with chemical formulations should be used only where the more benign product fails to remedy the insect problem.
• Use natural pest control methods for your lawn and garden – a lawn that is naturally healthy will resist pests and weeds. For problems that persist, there are non-toxic weed killers and grub control products available today.

• Keep filters clean on heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems
• Remove any water sources to mold affected area; dry thoroughly
• Keep relative humidity below 60%, which may require a dehumidifier in some areas
• Store items with high cellulose content (newspapers, drywall, cardboard) in dry areas

• Check the label of baby products to ensure they are phthalate-free
• When buying plastic products for the home, ask if they contain PVC or phthalates
• Avoid eating food stored or microwaved in PVC plastic
• Look for the recycling code #3 or V to spot PVC products before they enter your home
• Look for PVC-free draperies, window blinds and shades; choose natural fibers such as cotton, linen, wood, bamboo, silk or hemp.
• Keep indoor rooms well-ventilated

• Follow existing Federal Dietary Guidelines to reduce fat consumption.
• Reduce consumption of meat and dairy products

• Install water filters
• Use cold water for drinking, making tea or coffee,  and cooking
• Avoid fish high in mercury, such as king mackerel, tilefish, swordfish, shark, orange roughy, and marlin. Limit consumption of tuna, especially steaks and canned ‘white’ albacore.
• If your home was built before 1978, check for lead paint.
• Avoid buying products made with PFC, such as Teflon cookware and Scotchgard.
• Avoid using treated wood (CCA or ACZA) on decks or children’s play structures
• Avoid burning materials containing chlorine, such as plastics and wood treated with PCP
 
 

  • Avoid flame retardant children’s clothing and sleepwear.
• When purchasing new furnishings and bedding, choose wool or cotton fill over polyester and foam products.
• Increase fruits and veggies and reduce animal fats.
• Reduce dust levels by using damp cleaning methods.

• Install low-flow showerheads, reduce the temperature of the shower water
• Open the window or use exhaust fan when using hot water for shower or cleaning
• Locate clothes washer in garage or area with good ventilation

Friday, November 16, 2012

Safe or not. Water bottles.



At some point we are going to need to step back and look at what the convenience of our society is costing us.  Can we try to spend our dollars on things that won't hurt our future children and their children and on and on.  I am not a fatalistic, more of a romantic, and I have this illusion that we are going to clean up our act, quit putting harmful chemicals in our air, in our food, in products, such as toys, cleaning supplies, manufactured goods, on our bodies, in our environment and that we ARE going to make this a better place to live.  But can we?  Is there any will to do it? 

So many areas of our world have already been decimated out of ignorance, greed, profit margins, big corporations telling us "this is safe, trust us" and nature will repair itself, and we will fix it "later".  There is no later, we cannot continue trusting corporations that do not have our best interests as a priority.  Nature will not repair itself, we have run out of time to fix it.  We must begin to change our habits, alter our lifestyles, save ourselves.  Our government will not protect us, that has been proven with all the chemicals that have been allowed to be used over the last hundred years since our industrialization.  Our farmers have been pushed out by large conglomerates, and a safe food supply is almost non-existent.

Here is the problem as I see it.  We have for too long turned a blind eye, we have allowed the governments all over the world as well as the corporate entities to tell us what was safe.  If you look at their track records, well, government allows the corporations to tell them what is safe, until someone else comes along, for instance, scientists, activists, etc. and tell them differently, then sometimes, the government will put a band-aid on something, sometimes not.  The track record is not a good one.  Food safety, packaging, labeling.  The system seems to be broken.  Lets begin to figure out how to fix it.  My Opinion only.  Thank you for letting me rant.

Zerenol - IS IT IN OUR MEAT? OUR MILK?

ZERENOL - this is one of the last chemicals on my list that I wanted to cover in a series of blogs and I am frankly stumped.  There is very little information as far as research available and what I did get was not "official information" but rather stories about a report by Monsanto that was buried in the government office of the USDA or the FDA or somewhere.  It was a report about a 90 day study that was done by Monsanto, the company that makes the feed for cattle, or makes the growth hormone.  What is troubling is that it points in the direction of causing breast cancer, early onset of puberty, is in the meat and the milk of cattle and yet there are no clear answers.  There is also information that alludes to the fact that "Zerenol" is not always used but that there are substitutes being used.So many questions, are the substitutes also bad?  If they are growth hormones than how could they not be bad.

So, I really think there is more to this story but I will give you what I found and we can go from there.
This next clip is from 2006, however, it is a very damning video for hormones in milk.


Next, I would question WHY HAS THE EUROPEAN UNION BANNED use of growth hormones and the UNITED STATES HAS NOT.  This is a question that that is little evidence to support the reasons.  I found the definition of Zerenol in wikipedia, of course, that is just the description of what it is. On the verge of boring.  But where are the reports for why it is banned in one place in the world and not here, where it is being used the most? This Q & A section will answer the main question.

Q. During the seven years after the EEC ban on hormone-raised meat, the U.S. beef industry has continued to use sex hormones in meat. Why?
A. Hormones can be used to stimulate growth in cattle. Because farmers are paid based on the weight of the animals they sell for slaughter, the use of hormones has been seen as a way to boost profits.
http://www.preventcancer.com/consumers/general/hormones_meat.htm


That is the easy answer - for a profit.  The EEC banned it in 1989. There are additional facts, from the Prevent Cancer website.  However, the interesting part about the information from that website, is the fact that reports from the FDA had to be obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, because they are "protected" or "confidential" with regard to hormone studies in meat.

I was able to get the following information from the Cornell University site that had the following information:


What are the different hormones used now by the meat and dairy industries?
There are six different kinds of steroid hormones that are currently approved by FDA for use in food production in the US: estradiol, progesterone, testosterone, zeranol, trenbolone acetate, and melengestrol acetate. Estradiol and progesterone are natural female sex hormones; testosterone is the natural male sex hormone; zeranol, trenbolone acetate and melengesterol acetate are synthetic growth promoters (hormone-like chemicals that can make animals grow faster). Currently, federal regulations allow these hormones to be used on growing cattle and sheep, but not on poultry (chickens, turkeys, ducks) or hogs (pigs). The above hormones are not as useful in increasing weight gain of poultry or hogs.
As mentioned earlier, FDA allows the use of the protein hormone rbGH to increase milk production in dairy cattle. This protein hormone is not used on beef cattle.
http://envirocancer.cornell.edu/factsheet/diet/fs37.hormones.cfm

From Wiki-Pedia:  Zeranol (α-zearalanol) is a non-steroidal estrogen agonist. It is a mycotoxin, derived from fungi in the Fusarium family, and may be found as a contaminant in fungus-infected crops. It is 3-4x more potent as an estrogen agonist than the related compound zearalenone.[1]
Zeranol is approved for use as a growth promoter in livestock, including beef cattle, in the United States. In Canada, it is approved for use in beef cattle only.[2] Its application is not approved for use in the European Union. Recently the group of Bern and collaborator has shown the inhibiting action of isoflavones on the growth of breast cancer cells induced by xenoestrogens such as o,p'-DDT and alkylphenols. Such studies have suggested phytoestrogens could be inhibiting the hormonal action of the natural estrogens.[3]
Obese individuals may be at greater risk of developing zeranol-induced breast cancer.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeranol

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Phthalates .. DO NOT BE DECEIVED!

DO NOT BE DECEIVED about Phthalates as the information depending on where you get it is quite conflicted.  I personally cannot formulate an opinion with all this conflicting information, however, I think it is wise to ask questions.  Lots and lots of questions.
  •  If you get the information from the AMC (American Chemistry Council) aka manufacturers it is safe.  
  • The EWG (Environmental Working Group) says not.  
  • The FDA - well, they just don't quite know.   
So, here is the breakdown:
AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL:  
Straight from the American Chemistry Council, bringing you the news about Phthalates. I encourage you to get down a ways after this brief interpretation of this chemical.  For instance, who makes up this American Chemistry Council!!!!!!!!!


 Q. What are phthalates?
A. Phthalates are a family of compounds whose primary use is as a vinyl softener. They are colorless, oily liquids with little or no odor and low volatility. Phthalates provide many product and consumer benefits—public health, performance, durability and function—and are used in many important applications for these reasons, from recreational and safety equipment to medical devices to building and construction materials.

Q. What are phthalates used for?
 A. Phthalates are the primary plasticizer in use today because of performance, cost, durability, and overall product sustainability benefits. Primarily, phthalates are an important ingredient in flexible vinyl products, such as wiring and cabling, wall covering and flooring. They are also used in vinyl blood bags and IV tubing  used to help save lives. Other phthalates are used as solvents or fixatives, for example, to make fragrances last long.

Q. What is known about the safety of phthalates?
A. Phthalates are among the most thoroughly studied family of compounds in the world and have a long history of safe use. An immense amount of information on the safety profiles of various phthalates is available to the public and users of this Web site.
http://phthalates.americanchemistry.com/Phthalates-Basics/Questions-Answers?gclid=CNy5qKeQvbMCFUWnPAodtxkAEQ

 About Phthalate Esters Panel
The Phthalate Esters Panel (the Panel) of the American Chemistry Council (ACC) is composed of all major manufacturers and some users of the primary phthalate esters in commerce in the United States. Panel members include: BASF Corporation, Eastman Chemical Company, ExxonMobil Chemical Company, and Ferro Corporation. Teknor Apex Company, a major user of the materials, is an associate member. Since its inception in 1973, Panel members have demonstrated their commitment to the safe use of their products by sponsoring health, safety and environmental research on phthalate esters. Results of Panel-sponsored research are routinely shared with government agencies around the globe in order to support a comprehensive and thorough assessment of the safety of their products. Panel research and conclusions are peer-reviewed and published in respected scientific journals. Phthalate esters produced by Panel members have been subjected to extensive health and environmental scrutiny by both independent scientists and national and international government bodies. Since its inception, the Panel has funded more than $15 million dollars of research, excluding research conducted by individual companies. The Panel is committed to continued research and testing of phthalate esters and will continue to work closely with government agencies so that these materials can continue to be used safely in a wide array of products consumers find valuable in everyday life.
Panel Member Companies:
BASF Corporation
www.basf.com
Eastman Chemical Company
www.eastman.com
ExxonMobil Chemical Company
www.exxonmobilchemical.com
Ferro Corporation
www.ferro.com
Teknor Apex                                                     
www.teknorapex.com


WOW - ALL THESE COMPANIES WORK TOGETHER FOR SAFE USES, TESTING, RESEARCH! 


DO NOT BE DECEIVED!  

 Who would you believe, the manufactures that make a profit or others...  

The Environmental Working Group  says:

Phthalates have been found to disrupt the endocrine system. Several phthalate compounds have caused reduced sperm counts, testicular atrophy and structural abnormalities in the reproductive systems of male test animals, and some studies also link phthalates to liver cancer, according to the U.S. Center for Disease Control’s 2005 National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals. Though the CDC contends the health hazards of phthalates to humans have not been definitively established, for some years, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has regulated phthalates as water and air pollutants.

AND

In July 2008, as a result of pressure from EWG and other health groups, the U.S. Congress passed legislation banning six phthalates from children’s toys and cosmetics. Legislators in Washington, Vermont and California have restricted phthalate use in children’s goods, and several major retailers, including Wal-Mart, Toys-R-Us, Lego, Evenflo and Gerber say they will phase out phthalate-laden toys.
EWG advocates a cumulative assessment of the human health risks, especially to infants, of phthalates. As well, EWG is working for passage of a new federal Kid-Safe Chemicals Act to reform the nation’s toxic chemical law to assure that chemicals are safe for babies, children and other vulnerable groups before they are allowed on the market.

http://www.ewg.org/chemindex/term/480 

finally, the FDA information to the "I don't know who to believe" information. 

What does FDA currently know about infant exposure to phthalates?

Infants, like all consumers, are exposed daily to phthalates from a number of sources, including air, drugs, food, plastics, water, and cosmetics. We are currently beginning a survey of infant/children cosmetic products to determine the levels of phthalates so we can more accurately assess infant exposure.
The American Academy of Pediatrics has published an article stating that infants exposed to infant care products, specifically baby shampoos, baby lotions, and baby powder, showed increased levels of phthalate metabolites in their urine (see “Baby Care Products: Possible Sources of Infant Phthalate Exposure,” S. Sathyanarayana, Pediatrics. 2008, vol. 121, pp. 260-268). Like the CDC report, this study did not establish an association between these findings and any health effects. In addition, levels of phthalates (if any) in the infant care products were not determined.

How do I know if there are phthalates in the cosmetics I use?

Under the authority of the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act (FPLA), FDA requires an ingredient declaration on the cosmetic products sold at the retail level to consumers. Consumers can tell whether some products contain phthalates by reading the ingredient declaration on the labels of such products.
However, the regulations do not require the listing of the individual fragrance ingredients; therefore, the consumer will not be able to determine from the ingredient declaration if phthalates are present in a fragrance. Also, because the FPLA does not apply to products used exclusively by professionals--for example, in salons--the requirement for an ingredient declaration does not apply to these products.

At the present time, FDA does not have compelling evidence that phthalates, as used in cosmetics, pose a safety risk. If FDA determines that a health hazard exists, the agency will advise the industry and the public, and will consider its legal options under the authority of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act in protecting the health and welfare of consumers.
For related information, see FDA Authority Over Cosmetics.



 http://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/productandingredientsafety/selectedcosmeticingredients/ucm128250.htm

 
 WHAT, WHY AND HOW CAN SO MUCH INFORMATION BE OUT THERE.  SOMEONE HAS TO BE RIGHT AND SOMEONE HAS TO BE WRONG.  Who is the real deal. 
You decide.

Monday, November 5, 2012

The Deadly Plastics now have their own song


This was aired on the Today's show and can be found on You Tube.  It just has some statistics and information that will drive home the theme I have been using throughout my blogs that these are not healthy products or chemicals.

Sunday, November 4, 2012

Pbb, Pcb's - looks like Code for Trouble

Let's begin:

PBB as a three-letter abbreviation may refer to:
Let's try something else.  FLAME RETARDANT CHEMICALS..............................

\


Even though this happened several years ago, the effects of it are still tainting the landscape, the soil, and the people's lives.  I don't like the fact that this happened or that more lessons were not learned from the use of chemicals that are this toxic.  The difficulty in all of this is knowing that certain chemicals have been banned, yet more are produced to take their place and it is a constant fight to keep ourselves and our families safe.
 Here is a link to some research that was done on this particular incident in Michigan.  http://www.umflint.edu/research/student_programs/MOM/journal/2010/Dykstra.pdf

The above-linked document reads like a novel, with details about how it happened, what the political climate of the United States was at the time, the declarations made by the politicians that it was safe, and on and on.  It also gave information about cancer risk, pre-mature menstruation in young girls and and the onset of menopause prematurely in older women.    Additionally, it discussed the burial sites and this is the quote, 
"Disposal Sites - The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality stated that there were only two sites in Michigan chosen as burial pits, Mio and Kalkaska (mdeq.gov). Further investigation at the Calhoun County Health Department in Battle Creek, Michigan revealed more burial sites of animal carcasses and feed. Those sites are: Pennfield Landfill in Calhoun County, Michigan, Smiths Creek Landfill in Kimball Township, St. Clair County, Forest Waste Disposal, Otisville, Genesee County, three sites in Sanilac County and the State of Nevada.

All health departments in the state were contacted and only two responded. In the burial pits; 33,000 cattle, 1.5 million chickens 1,470 sheep, 5,920 hogs, 865 tons of feed, 17,900 pounds of cheese, 2,630 pounds of butter, 34,000 pounds of dry milk and 5 million eggs were buried.


It was in the 1970's in Michigan, but flame-retardent chemicals by any other name are still harmful as you can gather in the following You Tube Videos. 


Friday, November 2, 2012

#7 on our Endocrine Disrupter Countdown

Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB)

Whoever reads my blogs, whoever follows, comments, shares, likes, need to know that sometimes my learning curve is a little curvier than others some days and this is one of them.  PCBs were banned in the U.S. in 1979 but they are one of the environmental hormones I blog about.  It is a  Silent Enemy because it is still found everywhere even today.  

I found the information on PCBs from the EPA website, so instead of para-phrasing the information I have pasted it in with the link to continue reading up if you like after reading my blog.  Here goes.

PCBs - from the EPA website directly:http://www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/tsd/pcbs/pubs/about.htm

Seriously, they call it a man-made organic chemical.  You can read for yourself all the different products this particular chemical is used in, or as the EPA would have us believe, was used in -it is supposedly banned since 1979.  This next section came from the EPA publication. 

Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB)
PCBs belong to a broad family of man-made organic chemicals known as chlorinated hydrocarbons. PCBs were domestically manufactured from 1929 until their manufacture was banned in 1979.

PCBs were used in hundreds of industrial and commercial applications including electrical, heat transfer, and hydraulic equipment; as plasticizers in paints, plastics, and rubber products; in pigments, dyes, and carbonless copy paper; and many other industrial applications.

Commercial Use of PCBs
Although no longer commercially produced in the United States, PCBs may be present in products and materials produced before the 1979 PCB ban. 

Products that may contain PCBs include:
  • Transformers and capacitors
  • Other electrical equipment including voltage regulators, switches, reclosers, bushings, and electromagnets
  • Oil used in motors and hydraulic systems
  • Old electrical devices or appliances containing PCB capacitors
  • Fluorescent light ballasts
  • Cable insulation
  • Thermal insulation material including fiberglass, felt, foam, and cork
  • Adhesives and tapes
  • Oil-based paint
  • Caulking
  • Plastics
  • Carbonless copy paper
  • Floor finish
The PCBs used in these products were chemical mixtures made up of a variety of individual chlorinated biphenyl components, known as congeners. Most commercial PCB mixtures are known in the United States by their industrial trade names. The most common trade name is Aroclor.
Release and Exposure of PCBs
Prior to the 1979 ban, PCBs entered the environment during their manufacture and use in the United States. Today PCBs can still be released into the environment from poorly maintained hazardous waste sites that contain PCBs; illegal or improper dumping of PCB wastes; leaks or releases from electrical transformers containing PCBs; and disposal of PCB-containing consumer products into municipal or other landfills not designed to handle hazardous waste. PCBs may also be released into the environment by the burning of some wastes in municipal and industrial incinerators.
Once in the environment, PCBs do not readily break down and therefore may remain for long periods of time cycling between air, water, and soil. PCBs can be carried long distances and have been found in snow and sea water in areas far away from where they were released into the environment. As a consequence, PCBs are found all over the world. In general, the lighter the form of PCB, the further it can be transported from the source of contamination.
PCBs can accumulate in the leaves and above-ground parts of plants and food crops. They are also taken up into the bodies of small organisms and fish. As a result, people who ingest fish may be exposed to PCBs that have bioaccumulated in the fish they are ingesting.

Health Effects
PCBs have been demonstrated to cause cancer, as well as a variety of other adverse health effects on the immune system, reproductive system, nervous system, and endocrine system. See the Health Effects page for more information.


Wednesday, October 31, 2012

SEEKING THE TRUTH ... WITHIN ME


I wanted to pause from the targeted blogs that I have been posting about each of the different chemicals today.  Today,  I wanted to take time to remind myself what is important in our world.  I have been learning and reading about all the harmful chemicals we have saturated our land, air and water with and I am besieged with guilt and dismay at my own part in this destructive behavior. 

          Yet, I am can reflect on the way that our whole society has set itself up to consume.  We have built our legacy on freedom yet we are slaves to consumption.  At the detriment of our children and their children, we continue to consume.  Its not just consumption that we seek, it is also convenience.  The days of drinking out of a water hose in the back yard from the well water are diminished with the water we have today.  I read somewhere that there is no pure water left on the planet.  That all of our fresh water supply has some kind of chemical in it that was not there naturally a hundred years ago.  I don't want to carry little plastic bottles that will poison my body if they reach a certain temperature and in those bottles contains drinking water that is poisoned by arsenic and other pollutants. 

           Our world is in need of a large reset.  I know, I know that is a pipe dream.  No resets, no do overs, then at least a re-think. A conversation, a global conversation where we are all working in the same direction and not undermining our neighbors by continuing to harm ourselves and our future. 
Wow, got a little philosophical there for a minute.

Really, I just wanted to remind myself that I contribute to the problem every day and therein lies the problem.  If I start doing things differently then that is one less person creating problems.  That is all I can control and that is all I can focus on.  There are hundreds of thousands of intelligent people in this world so it won't hurt me to act intelligently and thoughtfully to make a difference in my corner.  That is all.   

Monday, October 29, 2012

My Heart Breaks - Endosulfan

When I started researching this chemical I began to get some very disturbing images.  You see, my heart started breaking into tiny pieces with every image I found and every article I read.  There is this village in India...oh, don't go anywhere...cause you might think that is far removed from you...or that has nothing to do with you and me...I could never be exposed to this sort of poison.   Let's begin with a lesson from Wikipedia.

DEFINITION:
Endosulfan is an off-patent organochlorine insecticide and acaricide that is being phased out globally. Endosulfan became a highly controversial agrichemical[1] due to its acute toxicity, potential for bioaccumulation, and role as an endocrine disruptor. Because of its threats to human health and the environment, a global ban on the manufacture and use of endosulfan was negotiated under the Stockholm Convention in April 2011. The ban will take effect in mid 2012, with certain uses exempted for 5 additional years.[2] More than 80 countries,[3] including the European Union, Australia and New Zealand, several West African nations,[4] the United States,[5][6] Brazil[7] and Canada[8] had already banned it or announced phase outs by the time the Stockholm Convention ban was agreed upon. It is still used extensively in India, China, and few other countries. It is produced by Makhteshim Agan and several manufacturers in India and China.


USES:
Endosulfan has been used in agriculture around the world to control insect pests including whiteflys, aphids, leafhoppers, Colorado potato beetles and cabbage worms.[9] Due to its unique mode of action, it is useful in resistance management; however, as it is non-specific, it can negatively impact populations of beneficial insects.[10] It is, however, considered to be moderately toxic to honey bees,[11] and it is less toxic to bees than organophosphate insecticides.


HEALTH EFFECTS: 

Endosulfan is one of the most toxic pesticides on the market today, responsible for many fatal pesticide poisoning incidents around the world.[37] Endosulfan is also a xenoestrogen—a synthetic substance that imitates or enhances the effect of estrogens—and it can act as an endocrine disruptor, causing reproductive and developmental damage in both animals and humans. Whether endosulfan can cause cancer is debated. With regard to consumers intake of endosulfan from residues on food, the Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations has concluded that long-term exposure from food is unlikely to present a public health concern, but short term exposure can exceed acute reference doses.[38]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endosulfan 


You can get more information on production and other details for yourself, but the images from this village in India pretty much tells the story.  


These pictures are from Kerala, India.
 WHY?


The Hindu: News out of New Delhi in an article dated July 27, 2012 headline reads

‘Allow use of endosulfan except in Kerala and Karnataka’


The Centre has asked the Supreme Court to allow the use of pesticide endosulfan in all States except Kerala and Karnataka, as these States are ready to use it for agricultural pest control.
The Supreme Court in May last year banned the production and sale of endolsulfan in the country. In April this year, it asked the Centre to ascertain the quantity of raw material lying with three companies (producers of the banned pesticide endosulfan) and the manner in which the raw material could be disposed of.http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3688642.ece
                                                                                  WHY?


 WHY?





June 2010 Endosulfan Action: EPA is taking action to end all uses of endosulfan in the United States. EPA has concluded that endosulfan poses unacceptable risks to agricultural workers and wildlife, and can persist in the environment. http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/reregistration/endosulfan/endosulfan-cancl-fs.html

  




I can only hope that your heart breaks also about these places in India that have been so impacted by this product. But then I am not finished.  You can see the map of the United States I am providing you along with the link where that map came from and the logic behind the long drawn out ban or phase out as they call it just makes no sense to me.  
 http://daily.sightline.org/2012/10/18/farm-workers-arctic-tribes-and-pesticides-on-northwest-crops/